2005 Ford Mustang vs. 1982 Skoda L
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Skoda L would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1982 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1982 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mustang weights approximately 672 kg more than 1982 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (326 Nm) has 252 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Skoda L. (74 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Mustang | 1982 Skoda L | |
| Make | Ford | Skoda |
| Model | Mustang | L |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4015 cc | 1046 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 326 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 68.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 72 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 825 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 38 L |
