2005 Ford Mustang vs. 1982 Volvo 360
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 360 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1982 Volvo 360. (101 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1982 Volvo 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mustang weights approximately 397 kg more than 1982 Volvo 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (326 Nm) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volvo 360. (163 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volvo 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Mustang | 1982 Volvo 360 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Mustang | 360 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4015 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 326 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 80 mm |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 58 L |
