2005 Ford Mustang vs. 1983 Volvo 240

To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1983 Volvo 240. (96 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1983 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mustang weights approximately 207 kg more than 1983 Volvo 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (326 Nm) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Volvo 240. (157 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Volvo 240.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Ford Mustang 1983 Volvo 240
Make Ford Volvo
Model Mustang 240
Year Released 2005 1983
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4015 cc 1986 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 202 HP 96 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 326 Nm 157 Nm
Engine Bore Size 100 mm 82.8 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 93 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1497 kg 1290 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4790 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2660 mm