2005 Ford Mustang vs. 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 202 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 83 kg more than 2005 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (326 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma. (270 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Mustang | 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Mustang | Sigma |
Year Released | 2005 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 2972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 326 Nm | 270 Nm |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2730 mm |