2005 Ford Mustang vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Clio would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (62 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mustang weights approximately 582 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (326 Nm) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (118 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Mustang | 1991 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Mustang | Clio |
Year Released | 2005 | 1991 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 326 Nm | 118 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 93 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.4 L/100km | 5.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 4.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 43 L |