2005 Ford Mustang vs. 1992 Mini MK VI

To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mini MK VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mini MK VI would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1992 Mini MK VI. (41 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1992 Mini MK VI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mustang weights approximately 877 kg more than 1992 Mini MK VI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mini MK VI, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (326 Nm) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mini MK VI. (68 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mini MK VI.

Compare all specifications: