2005 Ford Mustang vs. 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. (175 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mustang weights approximately 27 kg more than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (326 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. (251 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Mustang | 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Mustang | Sigma |
Year Released | 2005 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 2972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 326 Nm | 251 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2730 mm |