2005 Ford Mustang vs. 1992 Toyota Sera
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Toyota Sera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Toyota Sera would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1992 Toyota Sera. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1992 Toyota Sera. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mustang weights approximately 487 kg more than 1992 Toyota Sera. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Toyota Sera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (335 Nm) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Toyota Sera. (132 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Toyota Sera.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Mustang | 1992 Toyota Sera | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Mustang | Sera |
Year Released | 2005 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4009 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 335 Nm | 132 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 100.5 mm | 73.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 87.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1387 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2410 mm |