2005 Ford Mustang vs. 1993 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Renault Clio would be higher. At 4,603 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1993 Renault Clio. (138 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1993 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mustang weights approximately 590 kg more than 1993 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (434 Nm) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Renault Clio. (187 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Mustang | 1993 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Mustang | Clio |
Year Released | 2005 | 1993 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 4603 cc | 1764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 434 Nm | 187 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 83.5 mm |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1565 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1400 mm |