2005 Ford Mustang vs. 1996 Lada 110
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lada 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lada 110 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1996 Lada 110. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1996 Lada 110.
Because 2005 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lada 110, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (310 Nm) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Lada 110. (128 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Lada 110.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Mustang | 1996 Lada 110 | |
Make | Ford | Lada |
Model | Mustang | 110 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 128 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2500 mm |