2005 Ford Mustang vs. 1996 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Oldsmobile SS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Oldsmobile SS would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 202 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Because 2005 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (326 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Oldsmobile SS. (318 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Oldsmobile SS.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Mustang | 1996 Oldsmobile SS | |
Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
Model | Mustang | SS |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 326 Nm | 318 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1900 mm |