2005 Ford Mustang vs. 1998 Rover 400

To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 400 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1998 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 400.

Because 2005 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (326 Nm) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 400. (145 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 400.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Ford Mustang 1998 Rover 400
Make Ford Rover
Model Mustang 400
Year Released 2005 1998
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4015 cc 1589 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 202 HP 109 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 326 Nm 145 Nm
Engine Bore Size 100 mm 80 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 79 mm
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4370 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2560 mm