2005 Ford Mustang vs. 1999 Oldsmobile LSS
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Oldsmobile LSS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Oldsmobile LSS would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 202 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Oldsmobile LSS weights approximately 91 kg more than 2005 Ford Mustang.
Because 2005 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Oldsmobile LSS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (326 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Oldsmobile LSS. (312 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Oldsmobile LSS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Mustang | 1999 Oldsmobile LSS | |
| Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Mustang | LSS |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4015 cc | 3784 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 202 HP |
| Torque | 326 Nm | 312 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 1588 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2780 mm |
