2005 Ford Mustang vs. 1999 Renault Zo
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Zo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Zo would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1999 Renault Zo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Zo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Zo weights approximately 78 kg more than 2005 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (310 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Renault Zo. (260 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Renault Zo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Mustang | 1999 Renault Zo | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Mustang | Zo |
Year Released | 2005 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 260 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 1575 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 83 L |