2005 Ford Mustang vs. 2000 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Smart Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Smart Roadster would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2000 Smart Roadster. (101 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2000 Smart Roadster.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (326 Nm) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Smart Roadster. (130 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Smart Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Mustang | 2000 Smart Roadster | |
Make | Ford | Smart |
Model | Mustang | Roadster |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 326 Nm | 130 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 66.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 67 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 5.3 L/100km |