2005 Ford Mustang vs. 2001 Volvo SCC
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Volvo SCC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Volvo SCC would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2001 Volvo SCC. (208 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2001 Volvo SCC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Volvo SCC weights approximately 64 kg more than 2005 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (335 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Volvo SCC. (285 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Volvo SCC. 2001 Volvo SCC has automatic transmission and 2005 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2005 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Volvo SCC will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Mustang | 2001 Volvo SCC | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Mustang | SCC |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4009 cc | 2521 cc |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 335 Nm | 285 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1387 kg | 1451 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 70 L |
