2005 Ford Mustang vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, both 2005 Ford Mustang and 2005 MCC Crossblade were released in the same year (2005). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (202 HP) has 132 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mustang weights approximately 753 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (326 Nm) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Mustang | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Ford | MCC |
| Model | Mustang | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 4015 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 326 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 744 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 1810 mm |
