2005 Ford Mustang vs. 2007 Ford E-250
To start off, 2007 Ford E-250 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2007 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford E-250.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (434 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford E-250. (388 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Mustang | 2007 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Mustang | E-250 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2007 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4603 cc | 4604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 434 Nm | 388 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 132 L |