2005 Ford Mustang vs. 2008 MG ZT
To start off, 2008 MG ZT is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2008 MG ZT. (134 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2008 MG ZT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 MG ZT weights approximately 128 kg more than 2005 Ford Mustang.
Because 2005 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 MG ZT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (326 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 MG ZT. (215 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 MG ZT.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Mustang | 2008 MG ZT | |
Make | Ford | MG |
Model | Mustang | ZT |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 326 Nm | 215 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 80.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 89.3 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 1625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 12.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 65 L |