2005 Ford Mustang vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (147 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mustang weights approximately 142 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (326 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (186 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Mustang | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Mustang | 6 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 1999 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 147 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 326 Nm | 186 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 83.1 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 64 L |