2005 Ford Mustang vs. 2012 Lexus HS
To start off, 2012 Lexus HS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2012 Lexus HS. (187 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2012 Lexus HS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Lexus HS weights approximately 145 kg more than 2005 Ford Mustang.
Because 2005 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Lexus HS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Mustang | 2012 Lexus HS | |
| Make | Ford | Lexus |
| Model | Mustang | HS |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4606 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1565 kg | 1710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4694 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1506 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.6 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 55 L |
