2005 Ford Mustang vs. 2012 Nissan X-Trail

To start off, 2012 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2012 Nissan X-Trail. (137 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan X-Trail.

Because 2012 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (326 Nm) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan X-Trail. (198 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan X-Trail.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Ford Mustang 2012 Nissan X-Trail
Make Ford Nissan
Model Mustang X-Trail
Year Released 2005 2012
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4015 cc 1997 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 202 HP 137 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 326 Nm 198 Nm
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4640 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1690 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2640 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 10.7 L/100km 6.5 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 61 L 65 L