2005 Ford Puma vs. 1951 Jaguar MK V
To start off, 2005 Ford Puma is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jaguar MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jaguar MK V would be higher. At 3,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Jaguar MK V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Jaguar MK V (123 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2005 Ford Puma. (100 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Jaguar MK V should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Jaguar MK V weights approximately 640 kg more than 2005 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Jaguar MK V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Jaguar MK V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Puma | 1951 Jaguar MK V | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Puma | MK V |
Year Released | 2005 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3483 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1675 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2900 mm |