2005 Ford Puma vs. 1962 Lancia Flavia
To start off, 2005 Ford Puma is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lancia Flavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lancia Flavia would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Lancia Flavia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Lancia Flavia (101 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2005 Ford Puma. (100 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Lancia Flavia should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Lancia Flavia weights approximately 115 kg more than 2005 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Puma | 1962 Lancia Flavia | |
Make | Ford | Lancia |
Model | Puma | Flavia |
Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 42 L |