2005 Ford Puma vs. 1966 Lancia Fulvia
To start off, 2005 Ford Puma is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lancia Fulvia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lancia Fulvia would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Puma weights approximately 75 kg more than 1966 Lancia Fulvia.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Puma | 1966 Lancia Fulvia | |
Make | Ford | Lancia |
Model | Puma | Fulvia |
Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 42 L |