2005 Ford Puma vs. 1967 Jensen FF
To start off, 2005 Ford Puma is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jensen FF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jensen FF would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Jensen FF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Jensen FF (279 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 2005 Ford Puma. (100 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Jensen FF should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Jensen FF weights approximately 940 kg more than 2005 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Jensen FF (587 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 439 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Puma. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1967 Jensen FF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Puma | 1967 Jensen FF | |
| Make | Ford | Jensen |
| Model | Puma | FF |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 6276 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 279 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 148 Nm | 587 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 108 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 85.9 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2780 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 72 L |
