2005 Ford Puma vs. 1986 Renault 21
To start off, 2005 Ford Puma is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Renault 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Renault 21 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Puma (100 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1986 Renault 21. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1986 Renault 21. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Puma weights approximately 65 kg more than 1986 Renault 21. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Puma (148 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Renault 21. (72 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Renault 21.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Puma | 1986 Renault 21 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Puma | 21 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 148 Nm | 72 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 66 L |