2005 Ford Puma vs. 1995 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2005 Ford Puma is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Puma (100 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1995 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Puma weights approximately 69 kg more than 1995 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Puma (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Puma | 1995 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Puma | Midge |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1323 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 148 Nm | 101 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
