2005 Ford Puma vs. 1997 Proton 300
To start off, 2005 Ford Puma is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Proton 300 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Puma (100 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1997 Proton 300. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1997 Proton 300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Puma (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Proton 300. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Proton 300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Puma | 1997 Proton 300 | |
Make | Ford | Proton |
Model | Puma | 300 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2450 mm |