2005 Ford Puma vs. 2000 Tata Estate

To start off, 2005 Ford Puma is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Tata Estate. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Tata Estate would be higher. At 1,948 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Tata Estate is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Puma (100 HP) has 33 more horse power than 2000 Tata Estate. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 2000 Tata Estate. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Tata Estate weights approximately 605 kg more than 2005 Ford Puma.

Because 2000 Tata Estate is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Tata Estate. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Puma (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Tata Estate. (119 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Tata Estate.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Ford Puma 2000 Tata Estate
Make Ford Tata
Model Puma Estate
Year Released 2005 2000
Engine Size 1498 cc 1948 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 100 HP 67 HP
Torque 148 Nm 119 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1035 kg 1640 kg
Vehicle Length 3990 mm 4630 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1620 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2830 mm