2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1946 Triumph 1800
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Triumph 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Triumph 1800 would be higher. At 1,774 cc (4 cylinders), 1946 Triumph 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (86 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1946 Triumph 1800. (64 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1946 Triumph 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 210 kg more than 1946 Triumph 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Ranger | 1946 Triumph 1800 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Ranger | 1800 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1946 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1753 cc | 1774 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 6.7:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1092 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2550 mm |
