2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1952 MG YB
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 MG YB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 MG YB would be higher. At 1,758 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (86 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1952 MG YB. (45 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1952 MG YB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 152 kg more than 1952 MG YB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (137 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 MG YB. (79 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 MG YB.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Ranger | 1952 MG YB | |
| Make | Ford | MG |
| Model | Ranger | YB |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 1758 cc | 1250 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 45 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 137 Nm | 79 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1212 kg | 1060 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2520 mm |
