2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1952 Triumph Renown
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Triumph Renown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (86 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Renown. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 22 kg more than 1952 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Triumph Renown (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (135 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1952 Triumph Renown will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Ranger | 1952 Triumph Renown | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Ranger | Renown |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1753 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1280 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2750 mm |
