2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1953 Jaguar C-Type
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jaguar C-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jaguar C-Type would be higher. At 3,440 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Jaguar C-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Jaguar C-Type (217 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Jaguar C-Type should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 296 kg more than 1953 Jaguar C-Type.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Jaguar C-Type. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Jaguar C-Type (330 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (252 Nm). This means 1953 Jaguar C-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Ranger | 1953 Jaguar C-Type | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Ranger | C-Type |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2983 cc | 3440 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 252 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1311 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2450 mm |
