2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1954 Riley RM A
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Riley RM A weights approximately 27 kg more than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1954 Riley RM A | |
Make | Ford | Riley |
Model | Ranger | RM A |
Year Released | 2005 | 1954 |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2870 mm |