2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1961 Mini MK I

To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Mini MK I would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (104 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1961 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1961 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 708 kg more than 1961 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (172 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Mini MK I.

Compare all specifications: