2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1963 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 213 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (250 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Ranger | 1963 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Ranger | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1085 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2540 mm |
