2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1963 Simca 1500
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Simca 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Simca 1500 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (86 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1963 Simca 1500. (68 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1963 Simca 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 279 kg more than 1963 Simca 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (170 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Simca 1500. (124 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Simca 1500.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1963 Simca 1500 | |
Make | Ford | Simca |
Model | Ranger | 1500 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1475 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 996 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2530 mm |