2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Ranger | 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 | |
| Make | Ford | Willys-Overland |
| Model | Ranger | Aero-Willys 2600 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2983 cc | 2636 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2740 mm |
