2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1964 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1964 Plymouth Valiant. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1964 Plymouth Valiant.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Plymouth Valiant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1964 Plymouth Valiant | |
Make | Ford | Plymouth |
Model | Ranger | Valiant |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4009 cc | 2789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2700 mm |