2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1964 Seat 1500
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (110 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1964 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1964 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 115 kg more than 1964 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Ranger | 1964 Seat 1500 | |
| Make | Ford | Seat |
| Model | Ranger | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1481 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1160 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2660 mm |
