2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1967 Zastava 1500
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (206 HP) has 153 more horse power than 1967 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1967 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 318 kg more than 1967 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Zastava 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (323 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1967 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | Ford | Zastava |
Model | Ranger | 1500 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 4009 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 323 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 980 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2430 mm |