2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1969 Seat 600
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,753 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (86 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1969 Seat 600. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1969 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 727 kg more than 1969 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (135 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1969 Seat 600 | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Ranger | 600 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 767 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 47 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 575 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2010 mm |