2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1970 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Ford Falcon (155 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Ford Falcon weights approximately 152 kg more than 2005 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Ford Falcon (326 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1970 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1970 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Ranger | Falcon |
Year Released | 2005 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 4093 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 326 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1360 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2830 mm |