2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1970 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1970 Triumph Spitfire. (62 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1970 Triumph Spitfire. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 428 kg more than 1970 Triumph Spitfire. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Triumph Spitfire. (93 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Triumph Spitfire.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1970 Triumph Spitfire | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Ranger | Spitfire |
Year Released | 2005 | 1970 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 780 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2110 mm |