2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1970 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (153 HP) has 86 more horse power than 1970 Triumph Spitfire. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1970 Triumph Spitfire. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 561 kg more than 1970 Triumph Spitfire. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (252 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Triumph Spitfire. (99 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Triumph Spitfire.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1970 Triumph Spitfire | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Ranger | Spitfire |
Year Released | 2005 | 1970 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 252 Nm | 99 Nm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1311 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2110 mm |