2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1971 Holden Belmont
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 2,833 cc (6 cylinders), 1971 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Holden Belmont (116 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (86 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Holden Belmont should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Holden Belmont weights approximately 65 kg more than 2005 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Holden Belmont (228 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (170 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1971 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1971 Holden Belmont | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Ranger | Belmont |
Year Released | 2005 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 2833 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 228 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1340 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2830 mm |