2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1971 Triumph TR6
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Triumph TR6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Triumph TR6 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1971 Triumph TR6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Triumph TR6 (104 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (86 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Triumph TR6 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 217 kg more than 1971 Triumph TR6.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Triumph TR6 (194 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (135 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1971 Triumph TR6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1971 Triumph TR6 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Ranger | TR6 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1971 |
Body Type | Pickup | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 194 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1085 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 64 L |