2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1972 Nissan 240 C
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 2,565 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Nissan 240 C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Nissan 240 C weights approximately 112 kg more than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Nissan 240 C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Ranger | 1972 Nissan 240 C | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Ranger | 240 C |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2565 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1320 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2700 mm |
