2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1973 Mazda 929
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (110 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1973 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 115 kg more than 1973 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda 929. (137 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1973 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | 929 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1768 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 137 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1160 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 65 L |